William Cowper Brann, self-styled 'Iconoclast,' opens this collection with a preface by Milo Hastings that frames Brann as a genius 'warped by his environment of time and place.' The volume gathers articles from various sources, including early issues of The Iconoclast, and sets the stage for a writer who relished verbal combat. Brann's voice emerges immediately in his defense of direct language: he attacks 'preternicety of expression' and 'affectation of euphemism,' linking linguistic prudery to moral decay. His targets include censors who drape statues and ban Hugo's Les Misérables from schools. The excerpt shows Brann wielding a sledgehammer style—blunt, sarcastic, and unapologetically confrontational.

A Style Forged in Controversy

Brann's prose is built for argument. He favors short, punchy sentences and rhetorical questions that challenge the reader directly. In the excerpt, he contrasts 'virile' writing with the 'emasculated' language of his day, calling out specific acts of censorship: Detroit putting 'bloomers on the statues of Dian,' Boston rejecting 'the Bacchante,' Waco draping a marble child. These concrete examples ground his polemic in observable events. He does not merely complain about prudery; he names places and institutions, making his critique local and immediate. His vocabulary is deliberately coarse—'foul sewer,' 'pimp,' 'nawsty'—to shock readers into attention. This is not a writer who seeks approval; he seeks reaction.

The Battle Over Literary Decorum

Brann's defense of Victor Hugo's Les Misérables becomes a case study in his broader war on censorship. He quotes Hugo's description of the Battle of Waterloo at length, focusing on the stand of Cambronne's square. The passage is grim and heroic: 'the gloomy squares, deserted, conquered and terrible, struggled formidably with death.' Brann uses this to argue that great literature confronts violence and mortality without euphemism. He mocks those who would shield young ladies from such material, calling them 'bewhiskered old he-virgins.' The contrast between Hugo's elevated prose and Brann's sarcastic commentary highlights his method: he borrows authority from canonical works to bolster his own iconoclastic stance.

The Editor's Frame: Milo Hastings on Brann's Legacy

Milo Hastings's preface provides an external perspective on Brann's work. Hastings describes Brann as 'genius audacious, defiant, and sublime,' but also notes the 'environment of time and place' that shaped him. He admits frustration that Brann 'wasted thought on free silver economics, spent passion on prohibition and negro criminals, lavished wrath on provincial preachers.' This framing acknowledges the parochial nature of many targets while insisting on Brann's literary merit. Hastings's tone is elegiac—he writes of 'impotent, futile rage' at the circumstances that produced Brann. The preface thus sets up a tension: the reader is to appreciate Brann's style and force while recognizing his limitations as a product of 1890s Texas.

Readers approaching this volume should expect a writer who prizes directness over politeness and argument over agreement. Brann's targets may seem dated—local politicians, prohibitionists, Comstockery—but his method of using specific, named instances to attack broader principles remains instructive. The collection rewards those who read for style and rhetorical strategy rather than for settled opinion. Brann forces a response; whether one cheers or objects, his prose demands engagement.