About 295 minutes
The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) — A Closer Reading
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
67,850 recorded words. 6 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #74444For The Merry-Go-Round — Reading Notes, the stored edition analysis reports 66,407 words, 4 hr 49 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Essays,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 295 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
67,850 recorded words. 6 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #74444About 310 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
71,077 recorded words. 21 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #67978About 257 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
59,083 recorded words. 32 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #39283Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 96 public books, 96 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergCarl Van Vechten opens The Merry-Go-Round with a provocative essay, “In Defence of Bad Taste,” that immediately signals his combative, aphoristic style. He argues that American homes are decorated by hired professionals rather than by their inhabitants, proposing a satirical placard crediting the decorator. This blend of cultural critique and wit sets the tone for a collection that moves freely between music, theater, literature, and personal anecdote.
Van Vechten’s prose is studded with pointed asides and epigrammatic judgments. In “In Defence of Bad Taste,” he writes that “nothing clings so ill to the back as borrowed finery,” a metaphor that extends his argument about authenticity in domestic taste to broader questions of cultural borrowing. His vocabulary is precise and often ironic: he refers to “the household decorator” as “an important factor in domestic life,” the word important carrying a faint sneer. Similarly, in the dialogue about George Moore, he reports Moore’s claim that “one cannot imagine landscapes; one does not know whether there is a high or low horizon,” a remark that reveals Van Vechten’s interest in the concrete details of artistic creation. The author’s own voice emerges through these sharp, quotable lines, which serve as both argument and entertainment.
The collection’s structure is notably varied: several essays adopt a conversational frame, with the narrator recounting discussions with friends. In “An Interrupted Conversation,” the bulk of the text is a reported dialogue between the narrator and a character named Sitgreaves, interspersed with brief descriptive passages. This technique allows Van Vechten to present multiple viewpoints without committing to a single thesis. The dialogue is lively and specific—Sitgreaves declares that George Moore’s “great achievements are his memoirs,” while the narrator counters that Moore insists Hail and Farewell “is a novel.” The interruptions, such as the arrival of Marcel the concierge, inject a theatrical quality. Van Vechten uses these structural choices to blur the line between essay and fiction, creating a sense of immediacy and intellectual play.
Paris appears as a recurring setting and subject. The essay “Au Bal Musette” evokes a working-class dance hall, while “An Interrupted Conversation” is set in a Paris hotel where the narrator and Sitgreaves await “la petite Polonaise.” The city functions as a backdrop for discussions of art and taste. Van Vechten’s descriptions are sensory but restrained: the concierge Marcel stands “his apron spread neatly over his ample paunch,” and the room has “red curtains and the picture of Cupid and Psyche.” These details ground the intellectual talk in a tangible world. The author also returns to the theme of the artist’s relationship to his material: Moore’s need to visit Palestine to write The Brook Kerith is presented as a practical necessity, not a romantic quest. This emphasis on the concrete conditions of artistic production runs through the collection.
Van Vechten’s critical voice is deliberately performative. He adopts a persona of the sophisticated, slightly cynical observer. In “In Defence of Bad Taste,” he asks, “Why could not some similar plan of appreciation be followed in the houses of our very rich?”—the question is rhetorical, designed to expose hypocrisy. His judgments are delivered with confidence: he calls a remark by Sitgreaves “delightedly” agreed with, and he reports Moore’s fury at having Hail and Farewell called a memoir. The author does not hide his own preferences; he aligns himself with Moore’s view that selection and form distinguish art from mere reportage. This self-aware performance of taste is central to the book’s method. Van Vechten is not a neutral critic but a character in his own essays, and his voice—urbane, opinionated, playful—is the thread that holds the disparate pieces together.
Readers approaching The Merry-Go-Round will find a work that rewards attention to its stylistic surface. Van Vechten’s sentences are crafted for effect, his dialogues are staged, and his opinions are offered as provocations rather than final judgments. The book is best read not as a systematic treatise but as a series of performances in criticism, each essay a turn on the merry-go-round of early twentieth-century aesthetic debate.
What a curious comfort it is, watching Mr. Van Vechten turn his attention to a song or a face, as if saving it for later. It put me in mind of another collector of moments, one who wrote with enormous warmth to everyone he met. I found the same tender scrutiny in The Letters of Charles Dickens. Vol. 3, 1836-1870 — A Closer Reading. Both men simply noticed life, then quietly handed it back to us.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.